First class dissertation introduction

Article on how to write a first class dissertation or thesis

Article on how to write a first class dissertation or thesis
How to write a first class dissertation? There are two principal goals of dissertations the first is to demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the selected topics and.

Further, no relevant decisions of the ecthr were relied upon in the judgment e. Because human rights law was a key part of the debate, the relevant law had to be set out in such detail that the chapters following it could discuss, for instance, the right to a fair trial and the doctrines of direct and indirect effect without any need for constant repetitive explanation. You should use the harvard system for this type of academic document. If you want to earn a high mark for your thesis or dissertation, you must pay proper attention to your writing style. Ask for positive feedback, as well as constructive criticism, emphasising that your ultimate goal is to achieve a first-class mark in your dissertation.

A well-written introduction will motivate and interest the reader, whilst a poorly worded introduction will have the exact opposite effect. There is therefore a large amount of discretion afforded to the courts regarding techniques to avoid infringement of the convention. Both the claimant and the intervening uk government invoked the echr, arguing that article 21 of the brussels convention should be interpreted in conformity with article 6 echr to avoid excessively protracted proceedings, given that proceedings in italy were likely to take an unreasonably long time. Pertinent examples include the misapplication of human rights by the house of lords in mon. Right to a fair trial and civil jurisdiction permitting delay, restricting access and recognising incompatible judgments.

Any current issues relating to the research topic should be presented and arguments both for and against the topic should be included. If the word limit is 10,000 words, 800-1000 words should, ideally, be used on your conclusion 2. Further relevance of article 6 can be seen in the context of the ecjs analysis of forum non conveniens in owusu v jackson. For the ecj legal certainty under the brussels regime is clearly more significant than legal certainty either through party autonomy under jurisdiction agreements or through the right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time. In such a case, the exemplary approach of aikens j would easily resolve such human rights issues. Instead, pellegrini requires full compliance with article 6 standards as if the foreign court were party to the echr, such that failure to review a judgment against which standards is a risky practice. Erich gasser v misat concerned the validity of a choice-of-court agreement in favour of the austrian courts where one party had first seised the italian courts by way of negative declaration. Pfeiffer and plankl v austria (1992) 14 ehrr 692 cf. However, this area is not devoid of hope to effect compliance with this framework, montgomery must be overturned, which does not appear too remote a possibility given the extensive criticism of the case. Birmingham city university 2007, how to write a dissertation, viewed november 10, 2008& httpwww.

How to write a first class law dissertation - ward blawg
How to write a first class law dissertation - my honours law dissertation, top tips and a great video from an ex-cambridge professor.

Further, no relevant decisions of the ecthr were relied upon in the judgment e. Below is my honours law dissertation together with tips and a very special video from an ex-cambridge professor at the end. Although this proposition may be unfounded, particularly where access to a court is available somewhere, the exclusion on jurisdiction may still be challenged on article 6 grounds if disproportionate its aim. A well-written introduction will motivate and interest the reader, whilst a poorly worded introduction will have the exact opposite effect. You may also want to state challenges with implementing such safeguards.

Thank you so much, i would recommend your services to anyone. It has already been noted that evidence is crucial in determining a real risk of a breach of article 6. The existence of these breaches amounted to a practice incompatible with the echr and produced the notoriety of the italian legal system as the land that time forgot. Please research the subject in which you are most interested in writing about for your dissertation, then choose a sufficiently narrow angle to approach the subject or choose something that hasnt been discussed much before. In a very short response, the ecj effectively said that the echr did not apply because first, it is not expressly mentioned in the brussels convention and second, there is no room for it in a collection of mandatory rules underpinned by mutual trust between contracting states.

Fawcett concedes that the same result will be achieved in most cases, yet suggests that there may be borderline cases where this solution would work better and human rights concerns will have been taken more seriously. Many reliable sources can be found online on sites such as information sources list all secondary data sources such as textbooks, journal articles, websites, etc. Notwithstanding, arguments for the application of the indirect effect doctrine in this context are still applicable because the situations are essentially the same. It has been stated that excessive delays in the administration of justice constitute an important danger, in particular for the respect of the rule of law and for the legal certainty of citizens. For example, in konamaneni v rolls-royce industrial power (india) ltd, collins j (as he then was) recognised that the indian legal system had made attempts to reduce its backlog of cases, such that in the absence of sufficient evidence of an anticipated delay, it would indeed be a substantial breach of comity to stigmatise the indian legal system in that way, somewhat reflecting the principle that the claimant must take the appropriate forum as he finds it. The difficulty with such an argument in the civil jurisdiction sphere is that stays of proceedings concern transfers of actions abroad, not persons. However, the interests of states cannot always be reconciled with private party rights. If you are unsure which method you should use, it is best to discuss the issue with your supervisor. Such attention has been properly given on occasion, as demonstrated by both mance and thorpe ljj. In soering v united kingdom the ecthr emphasised that it was for member states to secure convention rights of persons within their jurisdiction, but that this obligation did not extend to non-contracting states, nor should it seek to impose echr standards on such states.

Ssj org